Andrew Van Meel is WT’s national BIM advisory lead and a national director based in Melbourne. Corey Jones-Viegas is WT’s BIM lead for New South Wales.

Between them, they bring more than a decade of hands-on experience integrating digital engineering into cost management across large-scale commercial and residential projects. Here they explain how to truly capitalise on the use of building information modelling (BIM).

Most BIM implementations promise cost certainty and fall short. The problem isn’t the technology, it’s the often governance behind it.

Reliable and timely cost information reduces risk, supports better decisions and safeguards value. Building information modelling (BIM) is often promoted as the solution, yet many projects fail to deliver on that promise.

Models are frequently not structured adequately or not established early enough to provide cost clarity, leaving stakeholders with inconsistent data and costly rework.

BIM can deliver, but only when established with governance and cost clarity in mind from the outset.

With the right foundations, it provides an information-rich, dynamic platform for tracking design changes against live cost data, enabling reliable tenders, better control through construction and the digitalisation of asset data that supports long-term facilities management.

Making BIM work for cost

BIM is often associated with 3D design, but its core value for developers lies in commercial insight and project lifecycle savings.

WT, an international project advisory firm operating across more than 70 offices globally, has built its approach around independent client-side BIM management ensuring models are structured from the start to serve cost transparency, not just design coordination.

When overseen by an independent BIM manager, properly governed models contain accurate, live quantities that enable faster, more reliable cost planning.

As designs evolve, those quantities can be updated in near real time, giving project leads a continuous read on how design decisions affect the bottom line.

Paired with a digitally enabled cost planning team, take-offs can be refreshed as designs develop, keeping cost advice live and responsive.

▲ Clear data requirements and milestone compliance checks are what separate BIM success from costly underperformance.

Regular model exchanges between design and cost teams enable iterative refinement of pricing, creating a feedback loop where cost insights inform design decisions and design development enhances cost accuracy.

Multiple design solutions can be costed and compared quickly, avoiding lengthy manual remeasurement.

BIM therefore shifts beyond a design aid to become a strategic tool: providing a repeatable and transparent baseline that allows developers and their cost planning teams to make informed decisions about value, performance and risk.

Where governance makes the difference

BIM’s benefits won’t emerge automatically. Success requires careful planning, detailed definition of data requirements and a coherent governance framework backed by milestone compliance checks. Inconsistent modelling standards, over- or under-modelling of elements, software incompatibilities, skill gaps, unclear responsibilities and late model access are all common barriers.

Establishing clear information requirements at the outset, covering organisational, project, asset and exchange needs, translates high-level objectives into practical guidance for model structure, detail and maintenance.

A robust BIM execution plan (BEP) further defines responsibilities and workflows, ensuring all participants understand expectations and how BIM deliverables will be used for cost planning.

This governance is not process for its own sake. It is the foundation that allows BIM to be leveraged across all project management streams, not just design.

Cost certainty across the lifecycle

The benefits of rigorous set-up are evident at every stage. In early design, linking cost codes to model elements and defining cost requirements through a model cost plan creates a structured framework that keeps design decisions aligned with budget parameters.

As projects progress towards tender, BIM speeds up cost planning and helps resolve coordination issues earlier, lowering contractors’ risk allowances and typically resulting in more competitive tenders.

▲ Independent BIM oversight keeps models commercially useful from concept through to asset handover.

During construction, variations can be assessed more quickly and transparently using the live model rather than multiple drawing revisions. Progress claims can be validated by linking model elements to completion status, providing an objective basis for payment and reducing disputes.

At handover, well-maintained models provide reliable as-built records, simplifying final account settlement and establishing a strong foundation for facilities management, lifecycle costing, maintenance planning and future expansion.

The case for independent oversight

Not all models are created equal. Consultants may configure BIM to suit their discipline; contractors may prioritise buildability and risk transfer. Both perspectives are valid, but neither necessarily aligns with a developer’s need for cost transparency.

Independent client-side governance ensures the model remains anchored to the asset owner’s objectives, delivering consistent, verifiable cost information rather than a design record that happens to contain data.

Independent oversight removes consultant and contractor bias, enforces consistent standards across all parties and provides regular health checks on model accuracy and ISO 19650 compliance. This strengthens accountability and ensures the data continues to support decision-making rather than serving only as a design record.

Even projects already under way, or operational assets, can benefit from retrofitting structured BIM oversight to improve lifecycle management and operational planning.

For organisations new to the approach, piloting on a single project before portfolio-wide adoption is a practical way to demonstrate value before scaling.

Digital tools, commercial outcomes

BIM is one of the most effective tools available for capturing cost benefits across the project lifecycle, but technology alone doesn’t deliver results. Commercially minded specialists are needed to establish and govern the processes that turn model data into genuine cost clarity.

Treated as a holistic platform rather than a stage-specific tool, BIM offers faster, more accurate information and stronger cost control, delivering the certainty and confidence that developers and asset owners need from the earliest design stages through to long-term operations.

The Urban Developer is proud to partner with WT to deliver this article to you. In doing so, we can continue to publish our daily news, information, insights and opinion to you, our valued readers.

PropTech

Sponsored Content

23 Apr 26

Getting Cost Certainty from BIM Takes Good Governance

Partner Content

Sponsored Content

06 Jul 22

Maximise Project Sales with Smart Online Collaboration

Partner Content